Archive for February, 2012

Proposed Vancouver highrise development divides neighbourhood

February 27th, 2012

A proposed highrise development at Kingsway and Broadway is being both praised as a model of dense and sustainable urbanism and denounced as a way-too-tall monolith that will escalate gentrification in Vancouver’s Mount Pleasant.

Opinion is divided over whether a 19-storey condo tower, developed by Rize Alliance Properties, would undermine or enhance the cool vibrancy of the trendy Main Street corridor and the livability of the adjacent neighbourhoods.

“We feel high-density development in this location, with such good accessibility to transit, merits a higher form of development. So we thought that 19 storeys was a reasonable fit for the site,” said city planner Matt Shillito.

The full-block site, bounded by Broadway, Kingsway, 10th Avenue, and Watson Street is one of three sites identified for taller buildings in the new Mount Pleasant Community Plan.

Rize originally intended to build a 26-storey tower but lowered it to 19 in response to negative feedback from the community.

The height reduction hasn’t satisfied the project’s critics, including Chris Brayshaw, owner of Pulpfiction Books on Main Street, near Broadway.

“There is concern that the Rize building will replace this community’s vibrant street culture with something more monolithic, corporate, and esthetically and ideologically out of keeping with the neighbourhood.”

But Gideon James, owner of Main Street’s wedge-shaped hipster hangout Gene Café, where bookseller Brayshaw gets his espresso, backs the Rize development.

“I’m supportive of this project because I’m supportive of density in urban centres. The arguments for that are clear on sustainability grounds,” said James.

“As a renter and someone who will never be able to buy property in this city, I’m happy to see density moving into the neighbourhood where I’ve lived most of my adult life. The more the better, really.”

The Rize project, which will include 241 market condos and a two-storey commercial base, goes to a public hearing tonight at city council. The proposal consists of four distinct buildings of five, five, nine and 19 storeys.

City staff have recommended approval of a rezoning application for the Rize project. But council is expected to get an earful from speakers warning that the development will be a visual blight on the landscape and a threat to what they say is the Main Street area’s low-scale, edgy, bohemian retail culture.

Rize, under the rezoning proposal, would provide a $6.2-million Community Amenity Contribution, with $1.75 million going to affordable housing projects in the neighbourhood and $4.5 million to cultural activities.

The rezoning application is a tricky one for the Vision Vancouver council: the party favours density around transit nodes, but resistance to the 19-storey Rize tower comes from within the centre-left party’s natural support base.

The Residents Association of Mount Pleasant (RAMP), which was formed to oppose the project, has argued that nothing less than the neighbourhood’s future is at stake in the Rize rezoning application.

“I think the area’s character would change completely. This is about the heart and soul of Mount Pleasant,” said RAMP activist Stephen Bohus, raising the spectre of the Main Street corridor gradually becoming another Yaletown.

“I see this as a watershed development for Mount Pleasant that would set a precedent for many similar glass towers.”

Rize vice-president Christopher Vollan said there are few spots better suited for density in Metro Vancouver than the southwest corner of Broadway and Kingsway given its access to current and future transit options.

“The city is growing and we have to put people somewhere,” said Vollan. “If not here, then where?”

City councillor Raymond Louie said the city has no intention of allowing extensive highrise development in Mount Pleasant.

“The Mount Pleasant Community Plan is very clear that this is one of three sites for dense development,” said Louie.

“I do not see it as a Yaletown or False Creek North or South scenario coming before council.”

Developer Vollan said the design of the Rize development will rely mostly on brick and stone, not glass. “We agree this shouldn’t be a Yaletown building. And it will not be.”

RAMP activist Bohus said that his group is not opposed to densification, but fears that a project the size of the Rize development will spur land speculation and the escalation of property taxes.

“It will displace lower- and middle-income earners here — students, artists and people just on the edge.”

Gene Café owner James said the Rize building shouldn’t become a “flashpoint” for debate about the gentrification that has hit Mount Pleasant in recent years.

“As far as what is happening to this neighbourhood, this project is completely neutral. Gentrification has been happening, and it’s an ongoing and inevitable process.”

James said restricting the supply of new housing is not going to halt the rise of property values in Mount Pleasant.

“Property taxes in this neighbourhood have already advanced so far that this project isn’t going to make any difference,” said James.

“There is masses of new development going on around here and people moving in. This is just another project.”

James added that “I can’t really believe that by restricting supply, you’re going to put a lid on property values or rents.”

The recent census found that Mount Pleasant was one of the fastest growing neighbourhoods in Vancouver between 2006 and 2011.

Developer Vollan said that the rise of property values in Mount Pleasant stems from increased demand and demographic changes. “I think it’s something that comes whether it’s four storeys or 40 storeys.

“And I don’t see this having any significant impact on lease rates along Main Street. I do see it having a business benefit in providing 3,000 to 4,000 new residents in the neighbourhood to support local business.”

Source: The Vancouver Sun

Property sales dip in Greater Vancouver and Fraser Valley, climb in rest of B.C.

February 22nd, 2012

VANCOUVER — While home sales in Greater Vancouver and the Fraser Valley dipped at the start of 2012, other regions across B.C. heated up, according to the British Columbia Real Estate Association.

The number of houses sold in the Vancouver region through Multiple Listing Service was down 13.4 per cent in January from the same month last year, the industry group said Wednesday.

In addition, the average price of a Vancouver home declined slightly, from $762,562 in January 2011 to $752,380 this year — a difference of 1.3 per cent.

In the Fraser Valley, sales dipped by 3.1 per cent during the same time period. However, prices rose 6.4 per cent from an average of $441,544 last year to $469,635 in 2012.

Meanwhile, B.C.’s northwest and northeast regions, Kamloops and Victoria saw sales gains of more than 10 per cent.

The biggest jump occurred in B.C.’s northwest region, where the average house price increased 14.2 per cent — from $214,357 to $244,872 — in the 12 months from January 2011.

Powell River, with an average price of $209,636, recorded the least expensive homes in the province­ — a figure down 1.2 per cent ($212,078) over January 2011.

Cameron Muir, chief economist with the BCREA, said consumer demand driven by low mortgage interest rates saw modest improvements in January from a year ago, despite a decline in provincial sales activity.

Across Canada, home sales were down 4.5 per cent in January from the same month one year earlier, while the number of newly listed homes edged down 1.4 per cent.

“This marks the first monthly decline in national activity since August 2011 and the biggest monthly decline since July 2010,” the Canadian Real Estate Association stated.

“The monthly decline reversed a string of monthly increases over the closing months of last year, and returned national activity to where it stood at the end of the third quarter of 2011.

January’s sales declines were led by Greater Toronto and Montreal, as well as a softening in other major centres such as Greater Vancouver, the Fraser Valley, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Ottawa.

Still, unadjusted sales last month were up four per cent from January 2011 and were even with the five- and 10-year averages for January sales, it said.

“The national housing market is stabilizing and remains well balanced,” said CREA president Gary Morse.

“That said, forecasts for economic and job growth going forward vary widely for different parts of the country, suggesting a possible continuation of a softening trend in some markets, as well as the potential that demand will pick up based on strong fundamentals in others.”

Source: The Vancouver Sun

B.C. population grows to 4.4 million with urban areas leading the way

February 16th, 2012

British Columbia’s population continues to grow rapidly, with new residents preferring urban metropolitan areas rather than rural centres.

And while Metro Vancouver is still taking its share of the growth, Squamish and Chilliwack metropolitan areas saw the biggest gains in population between 2006 and 2011, according to Statistics Canada.

The latest Census figures show B.C.’s population increased by seven per cent between 2006-2011, pushing the population to 4.4 million, and making B.C. the second fastest growing province next to Alberta. The Western provinces welcomed 30.7 per cent of Canada’s population growth for the five-year period, for the first time surpassing that of the Atlantic provinces and Quebec combined (306 per cent).

Canada’s population grew by 5.9 per cent in the five-year period to 33.5 million. The growth credited to the rise to immigrants, is the highest of the G8 nations.

In B.C., the Squamish metropolitan area posted the strongest growth at 14. 6 per cent, followed by Chilliwack at 11.9 per cent and Kelowna at 10 per cent and Metro Vancouver at 9.6 per cent. On the other end of the scale, Prince Rupert and Williams Lake were among the cities with the biggest population declines.

Peter Liang, a spokesman for Statistics Canada, noted the populations are different for individual cities. Langford, near Victoria, for instance, posted the strongest population gain at 30.1 per cent, followed by Lake Country in Kelowna, Port Moody (19.9 per cent) and Surrey at 18.6 per cent. Pitt Meadows was at 13.5 per cent, while cities like New Westminster, Burnaby, Langley, Coquitlam and Maple Ridge saw a 10-12 per cent increase.

The city of Vancouver’s growth rate was at 4.4 per cent – with most of the new population settling downtown, Mt. Pleasant and Fairview.

Meanwhile, some areas of Surrey, Langley and Port Moody and Coquitlam posted population growth of more than 100 per cent between 2006 and 2011 , according to the results. In Surrey’s Clayton area, the population more than tripled from 4,132 to 14,034, while a section of Port Moody saw its population grow from 1,276 to 3,684 since 2006.

Source: The Vancouver Sun

Vancouver home prices to fizzle, not pop

February 13th, 2012

VANCOUVER – Emily Yao admits to disappointment when her bid on a three-bedroom condominium in this desirable West Coast city was turned down last October.

But a month later the systems programmer, who moved to Vancouver from mainland China six years ago, snapped up the still-unsold condominium on Vancouver’s East Side for $550,000, a difference of $9,000 below the original price tag.

It’s a pattern being replicated across the Pacific port city, in a dramatic turnaround from the bidding wars, show day stampedes, and above-market offers that long dominated North America’s costliest property market.

“Since October, it was like someone turned off the tap. It became absolutely dead,” said long-time realtor Pam Allen.

What’s taking the sizzle out of Vancouver prices and putting the brakes on sales are expectations that rock-bottom Canadian mortgage rates will stay low, so there is no rush to buy.

At the same time, Chinese investors, who have long helped to underpin the city’s red-hot market, are holding back because property market curbs back home means they have less cash available.

But with immigrants still streaming in from China and elsewhere, and the city frequently rated one of the most livable on the planet, most experts see prices fizzling rather than imploding with a bang.

LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION

Hemmed in by mountains on one side, and the Pacific Ocean on the other, land-scarce Vancouver can’t build homes fast enough to cope with demand from locals, immigrants and Chinese investors, who see Canada as a perfect place to park their cash.

In a report published last month, Demographia, a consultancy on urban development, tagged Vancouver as the second most unaffordable of the housing markets it surveyed, with median house prices at 10.6 times income levels. No. 1 is Hong Kong at 12.6 times.

The average price for a residential property in Vancouver in December was $734,766, more than double the national average of $358,480, according to Canadian Real Estate Association data.

A single family home in Honolulu, the most expensive U.S. metropolitan market in data from the National Association of Realtors, fetched a median $597,000 US in the fourth quarter, while Detroit homes were worth a paltry $50,800 US.

Nearly one-fifth of Greater Vancouver’s 2.1 million people are ethnic Chinese, according to 2006 census data, by far the highest proportion for any city in Canada.

No official figures are available on the percentage of Vancouver home sales to investors from mainland China or Chinese immigrants. But local realtor Tom Gradecak says that in popular areas such as the West Side, a leafy block of land flanking the university, it could be 50 per cent, rising to up to 75 per cent for homes selling for more than $3 million.

“Chinese money is a big factor … today as it was in the period after 1986,” said David Ley, author of the book “Millionaire Migrants”, which examines the impact immigrants had on Vancouver’s housing market.

“House prices in greater Vancouver bear no relationship to the local labor market. Prices are kept high by offshore capital arriving from immigrants and from foreign investors.”

HOME FROM HOME

Money from Hong Kong investors, who were edgy ahead of the city’s handover to Chinese control in 1997, is credited with changing Vancouver’s skyline as immigrants streamed into Canada and funds poured into new condo towers that now dominate the waterfront.

The factors that tempted immigrants then remain today: the chance to learn English in a city that is a virtual “home from home” with Chinese eateries, TV channels and newspapers. Beijing is 11 hours away, versus 14 hours from Toronto or New York.

“I can see more and more people in the coming years going to Canada, and Vancouver is the No. 1 city they want to go to,” said Derek Lai, director of international property at real estate consultancy Colliers in Shanghai, who specializes in helping Chinese clients buy houses in Vancouver.

Despite a mid-recession dip around 2008, Canada’s housing market has remained resilient for the past decade, and the Vancouver market has outperformed the rest of the country for seven of the last 10 years.

Vancouver price rises peaked at a stunning 19.8 per cent in 2006, dipped in 2009, and came roaring back with double-digit growth in both 2010 and 2011.

A house bought for $500,000 in 2001 would have fetched about $1.2 million a decade later, based on average price changes.

But the latest month-to-month figures show Vancouver prices fell in five of seven months from last June to December, including drops of more than 5 per cent in November and December.

In the United States, the Case-Shiller index shows home prices are back at 2003 levels after a steep slump in 2008.

STEADY SLOWDOWN

There is always talk of bubbles, of course, but experts don’t see the Vancouver market crashing as the U.S. one did.

Mortgage rates are at near record lows just above 3 percent, but Canadian borrowing rules are tougher and the sub-prime market that downed the U.S. housing sector is tiny. With inflation muted and the economy recovering only slowly from recession, interest rates will likely stay low for years.

“I would anticipate Vancouver house prices falling further. We don’t know by how much,” said Sal Guatieri, senior economist at Bank of Montreal, co-author of a report entitled “Will Canada’s Housing Boom Forge On, Fizzle Out, or Flame Out?”.

“But that is one area that appears ripe for some sort of correction, though we are not anticipating a severe correction.

Chinese investment is still the wildcard. Reliable statistics are hard to find, but analysts expect Beijing’s moves to cool its own property market may hurt Vancouver.

Beijing has taken measures to rein in its property market – including raising mortgage rates and minimum downpayments – to ease public discontent with rocketing home prices. It has vowed to continue to thwart property speculation in 2012.

“In China, people put all their money into property. So with the market stagnant, their cash on hand is on hold and their investment all over the world is not as strong as it was last year or the year before,” said Collier’s Lai.

Realtor Tom Gradecak, who specializes in property in Vancouver’s pricey West Side, says it is too early to see any impact here, though he expects there will be some domino effect. In the business for the past 20 years, he remains sanguine about Vancouver’s real estate prospects.

“We will see ups and downs, but I think five years from now the prices will be higher than they are today,” he said.